Know what gets noticed. Before you launch.

Your most important message shouldn't get lost in your design. Discover what captures attention, what gets overlooked, and what to improve before anyone sees it.

  • 7 free credits
  • No credit card required
  • Backed by EyeQuant research
+Drop your design hereor tap to select  ·  JPG or PNG, up to 2,000 × 2,000 px and 20 MB
No design handy? Try one:

Your first analysis is free. Create a free account to see the result and keep your 7 credits.

What comes back, seconds later.

Three heatmaps, two scores, and a Unified Score that explains itself: a verdict, what is working, the top risks and what to change.

Long landing page
A sample landing page designattention heatmap
</>eye.ai - Validate your work ...
✕
AnalysesAccount ↗
⌄#Long landing pageRe-analyze
ResultsHeatmapsRecommendations
SolidExplain Score ↗

Region 1 of 3

▤Summary◉

The homepage needs work because competing emphasis between the large left headline and the right-side hero image plus the nearby primary CTA is fragmenting visitor focus and limiting quick understanding.

✓What's Working Well⌄
⚠Top Risks⌄
◌Recommendations⌄
12 credits remainingPurchase credits

One Unified Score, weighted by intent

Five dimensions, 0–100, with a band. Tell it whether the creative should convert, inform, reassure, build recall, stop the scroll or help compare, and the weights shift.

</>eye.ai - Validate your work ...
✕
AnalysesAccount ↗
⌄#05 · Long landing pageRe-analyze
ResultsHeatmapsRecommendations
SolidExplain Score ↗

Region 1 of 3

▤Summary◉

The homepage needs work because competing emphasis between the large left headline and the right-side hero image plus the nearby primary CTA is fragmenting visitor focus and limiting quick understanding.

✓What's Working Well⌄
⚠Top Risks⌄
◌Recommendations⌄
12 credits remainingPurchase credits

Two additional scores and three heatmaps

Attention, clarity and excitingness, each predicted from the pixels. See where eyes land, what registers, and what pops.

Clarity
Excitingness

Extended recommendations

Each one names the element, says how to change it and what user behaviour should improve. Written to act on, not to interpret.

  1. 1subheadline / body copy

    Increase contrast and tighten placement: move the subheadline and the first benefit bullet closer under the headline, shorten copy to one clearer sentence, and use a darker text color for better legibility.

  2. 2primary CTA

    Separate and prioritize the primary CTA: give the purple CTA slightly more vertical space above the hero image, increase its size by one step, and mute the secondary CTA styling so the trial button reads as the dominant action.

  3. 3hero image/illustration

    Reduce the hero image's visual weight: desaturate or slightly darken the image, crop it tighter to reduce peripheral detail, and add a subtle overlay that directs the eye back to the headline area.

Four ways in

Use it where you already work. No new dashboard to learn.

  • F
    Figma pluginSelect a frame, choose type and intent, run.
  • Ps
    Photoshop pluginSame analysis on any artboard, ads and print included.
  • @
    EmailAttach a design, get the results emailed back.
  • {}
    MCP serverUnified Score, heatmaps and extended recommendations from your own agent.

How it works.

  1. 1

    Choose your design

    A frame in Figma, an artboard in Photoshop, an attachment in an email, or a file from your agent.

  2. 2

    Set type and intent

    Landing page, social ad, email, app screen. Convert, inform, reassure, stop the scroll. The score is weighted accordingly.

  3. 3

    Read the result

    Heatmaps, clarity and excitingness scores, and a Unified Score with its verdict, risks and recommendations. Iterate, re-run, track the delta.

Attention science, not opinion.

eye.ai runs on EyeQuant visual attention models, trained on eye-tracking data and used by enterprise design and marketing teams to predict where human eyes go before a single user sees the design.

up to 90%
match with 200-person eye-tracking studies
Seconds
from upload to full result
0
test participants or live traffic
Millions
of eye-tracking data points behind the models

Free to try. Pay for what you use.

Analyses use credits. A basic analysis is one credit; heatmaps and full recommendations use more.

Free$0Try it on real work.
Start free
  • 7 credits, no credit card
  • Unified Score, heatmaps and recommendations
  • Figma and Photoshop plugins
Base$23per month25 credits every month.
Start with Base
  • 25 basic analyses, or
  • 8 analyses with heatmaps, or
  • 6 full analyses with heatmaps and recommendations
  • Add credit packs any time
Credit packs, per month+10 · $9+20 · $17+50 · $39+100 · $75

Questions

Everything you need to know in one spot. If the answers not here, send us a message to questions@eye.ai

Is this user testing?
No. eye.ai is predictive analysis, built to help you make better design decisions before testing or launch.
How accurate is it?
The models have been validated against large-scale human studies, including 200-person eye-tracking experiments, with predictions matching measured attention at up to 90%.
What tools does it work with?
Figma and Photoshop plugins, email (attach a design, get the results back), and an MCP server that returns the Unified Score, heatmaps and extended recommendations to your agent.
What is the Unified Score?
A single 0–100 grade across five dimensions: message clarity, focus and guidance, first-3-seconds readiness, cognitive load and goal fit. It is intent-aware, so the weighting shifts with what the creative is trying to do. Learn how it works →
What counts as a credit?
A basic analysis is one credit. Heatmaps and full recommendations use more: 25 credits covers 25 basic analyses, 8 with heatmaps, or 6 full analyses.

You might be surprised.

What stands out to you isn't always what other people notice. Drop in a design and see for yourself.

Drop a JPG or PNG here, or
No design handy? Try one:

7 free credits  ·  No credit card required